‍It looks like my last debrief was lost in the Shuffle. I had it return to sender, so by the time it is given to me and I'm able to resend it, I might as well have just sent this one.

‍

‍Instead, I'll update you all on what I've been doing with this Debrief instead. Also, I've a VERY important discovery to with you all!

‍

‍So. The last week I have been leveraging the KTM scale to assess and blow masses. By going down the scale, taking whichever point indicates, then running it as a concept against the said mass.

‍

‍In all cases, the mass was invariably found to blow without any other steps necessary. This was after dropping the use of the corresponding PPS values I had mentioned in my last few debriefs, because I was struggling with the use and application of an objective value to a subjective phenomenon (Postulates Per Second).

‍

‍Which has really been the crux of my research for the last 8 years. So, I've relegated this process to a repair and sort of Ruds - to be used at the start, during, and after a session, which leaves the main process. Which I'll get to in a moment.

‍

‍First, I need to share with you the discovery I've made, and why it's so important!

‍

‍That Discovery is now to truthfully and accurately assess something on and off the meter. Its real value - not a subjective version someone believes in or agrees with an Objective value for a subjective one.

‍

‍In order to do this, we first needed an actual standard value/ measurement for thought. We now have that with the value of any Thought per Second (TPS) being equal to 15 mN, I5 mJ, or, 0,05 Div of TA per second. That can be measured on an emeter. It's real. It conforms to MEST laws and values.

‍

‍The second factor was the assessment itself. I've recently spoken about how in a system or group of items, that at least one will assess as truth, provided that all items in that system are known and defined. But have further found that this also applies when ANY set of factors is defined.

‍

‍That means a list can be 5, 20, or 1000 items long. It is all up to the being's consideration, and upon assessment, at least one of these values would be found to read and indicate — on or off meter. But that is where things get strange.

‍

‍You see, in scientology, there's a really big M’U when it comes to meter reads and assessment. How they apply to listing and nulling. How they are capable of decerning truth or not — fact or fiction.

‍

‍The reality is; reads do none of these things. It is the BEING that establishes these things for themselves — at least this is the way it used to be until now!

‍

‍All a meter read does is register disagreement with the Bank. We ask someone if mother was good to them, and we get a read. This means that there is some disagreement on the part of the PC, and doesn't mean mother was necessarily bad to them. They can simply believe she was, while in reality, she was the most amazing woman you could ask for! It is then up to the auditor, through some process, to determine the truth and clear up any confusion.

‍

‍It is all not black and white, yes or no! To fall into this trap is a misfortune of many practicing the tech. The read and charge is really only a guide and indicator pointing to the truth. A truth that is very subjective in nature.

‍

‍I've been searching for a way to avoid this and accurately assess an objective value to charge. With this tool, I knew that all the tech could be aligned and streamlined unlike never before!

‍

‍Truth be told, I'd given up hope of ever being able to do this. I had seemed it impossible!

‍

‍But it isn't impossible! I found a way to do it and have come to refer to this method as the DOUBLE NEGATIVE ASSESSMENT!

‍

‍For simplicities sake, I chose the number 6 for the total number of items to be assessed - because it aligns with what we've been doing and corresponds to other discoveries made lately, like the gravitational constant and PPS!

‍

‍So first, I locate a mass, facsimile, or ask a question of the pc. Then, I note down - in TPS - how large each response is.

‍

• 10 TPS
• 20 million TPS
• 40 TPS
• 60 thousand TPS.
• 1 million TPS
• 20 billion TPS

‍

‍I go through the list each time asking, “this mass is NOT ____________ (item from list) TPS?" until one indicates. I cross that out, then repeat the question above. This is done until there's only one item left that is null, and does not indicate. That will be the correct item and number of TPS. That frequency (for example 1 million TPS) is run as a concept against the mass - until it blows.

‍

‍What I've found, is that when it does blow - it is a whole chain of incidents! This is really just blowing whole entire chains, but doing it in reverse! If that makes sense.

‍

‍See what I've discovered is that when assessing for a whole set of items, all but one of them is a lie. And just doing a Standard Assessment was not good enough. Because lies are something that is subjective and self-created! But leveraging lies against the reads (using postulated values to items), they are cancelled out.

‍

‍Leaving only one item that does not indicate or read because it is of the stated value!

‍

‍This allows us to discover the exact frequency of these incidents — in Thoughts Per Second- and match that frequency to as-is them! Quite a different approach, but one that's not totally unknown to us all.

‍

‍To recap all this:

‍

‍1.) You ask for or have the being locate a mass.

‍

‍2.) "OK, In Thoughts per second, how large is this mass?”

‍       [The being gives 6 answers, then the next question is asked.]

‍

‍3.) “Alright, tell me which of these values the mass is NOT?” 

‍

‍"It is NOT ________ (list values) Thoughts per second."

‍      [This is done with indicating values being marked off, until only one value remains.]

‍

‍4.) "I'd like to indicate that this mass is ________ (remaining value) Thoughts per second in size.”

‍

‍5.) "Now get the idea of that Frequency in TPS - and run it against the mass. Do this until it dissipates!”

‍

‍6.) When it looks as if it has. ASK, " has that discharged?”

‍

‍

‍That's how I've been running this thing. It is the key to being able to bring this altogether.

‍

‍With the Double-Negative Assessment, we can finally pin-point and run charge at will - with no Gradient! Any charge, anywhere, can be bested and gotten rid of in this way - with no repair or side effects - only gain!

‍

‍Well, a little repair! I've found it helpful to run the KTM scale as concepts, whenever there's a need to. Beginning, during, or between sessions. Although this has been minimal.

‍

‍It is the thing I've been waiting for. I can now write my next book. Then, once that's done — we can explore entire new vistas of what the tech can do!

‍

‍See? with this tool, I can now safely and accurately gather data on other areas and beings, such as angels, demons, and other the tans that go bump in the night. Look into science, technology, and all other sorts of areas.  The possibilities are endless!

‍

‍That's all I have for now. Please give this a test run! Then let me know how it all goes. I just hope this stuff works the same for you, as it does for me! If it does, we will be on our way.

‍

‍Talk to you all next week!

‍Love,

‍RON

‍