‍This week I would like to discuss the prospect of keeping our membership private, or leaving it open to the public, or both.

‍

‍Now that we have boiled the names of our FB groups down to just two, this is something that may need to be done. There are a lot of people doing a lot of work to reach the public, but a lot of this has fallen on deaf ears or produced a lackluster result. It can only be assumed that this is because of the lack of interest in self-improvement in general, and not through any fault of those trying to help, but the situation remains all the same.

‍

‍One factor could be that Esperianism is essentially an out-word growth of, and Improvement upon, scientology technologies. And as such, has only a potential membership base of those who are already scientologists or who are familiar with the subject. So, trying to advertise Esperianism as an entirely new subject, would be a wrong indication.

‍

‍In that case, Esperianism should be represented as a modern-day alternative to Scientology. If not, the Esperianism will have to make a clean break and done separately from ANY scientology, period!

‍

‍The only problem with that, would be that it is next to impossible to teach Esperianism without at least some reference to Scientology or L. Ron Hubbard. So, these are all things that must be considered when making this decision.

‍

‍For myself, I lean towards the first option. Esperianism is really an alternative to Dianetics and Scientology. Especially once I am finished writing this next basic back on refinements and discoveries made while trying to discover any out points with the preexisting tech and its application, correcting them in the process.

‍

‍That is the true nature of what Esperianism is and it would be foolish to represent it as something else. I understand people's reluctance with associating this practice with scientology (because of lost friends, family, money, and the bad experiences suffered) but are the things we have suffered worse than never obtaining spiritual freedom?

‍

‍I hardly think so. Nothing can be as worse as that.

‍

‍That being said, I would cap the subject of Esperianism and scientology with the upcoming book. Then I would continue any further research under an entirely new heading. This would give us all creative control and the freedom to grow without being withheld by... well, anything!

‍

‍That is where I stand on the subject. I would like to know what members of the group think about this. What should we do, moving forward? Only rely on word of mouth, keep membership to those who pay? Have a mixture of both?

‍

‍You get the picture.

‍

‍Anyhow. That's the most pressing issue this last week and it is one that needs to be addressed, we need to start consolidating our efforts into more specific areas and into reaching specific individuals. Otherwise, we would be wasting a lot of those said efforts.

‍

‍Another thing too. We could leave Esperianism as it is structured at the moment and do something else with the NEW Subject entirely. We are almost going to have to. Because based upon the results I've seen in practicing the new subject, one would probably tend to try and learn the data, and then selfishly use it only for themselves - instead of trying to help their fellow ma.

‍

‍There's a lot of that, so it would be better to charge upfront like scientology to avoid it. It won't be all people but it will be a big portion of them.

‍

‍Unfortunately, so many people are used to consumerism that they miss the value of chipping in and helping others. They think because they have paid for something, that it is their absolute right to do with it as they wish.

‍

‍In some cases, that is true. When it comes to cars, a movie, or even the homes they live in. But when it comes to ideas or philosophy, you cannot really do that, when you do, it fundamentally alters that which you've paid to learn - then it's no longer the same thing.

‍

‍With that being said, I may only offer the new data to those who are tried and true. At least for the near future. But for now, we should figure out this question of what to do with the Esperianism group?

‍

‍Ron